Highlight

Bleu: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation

Proposes BLEU, a quick, inexpensive, language-independent automatic method for evaluating machine translation quality.

Based on

Bleu: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation

By Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, T. Ward et al.Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Read original article →

The paper tackles the problem that human evaluation of machine translation quality, while thorough, is expensive, slow (taking months), and produces labor that cannot be reused for future evaluations. To address this, the authors propose a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation that is quick to run, inexpensive, and independent of the target language, so it can be applied broadly across translation systems and languages.

The central result is that this automatic method correlates highly with human evaluation while having little marginal cost per additional run, making it usable as an automated understudy that substitutes for skilled human judges whenever quick or frequent evaluations are needed. This mattered because it gave the machine translation community a practical, reusable, and scalable way to measure progress and compare systems without requiring costly human evaluation each time, a metric (BLEU) that became a standard in the field.

Abstract

Human evaluation of machine translation is thorough but slow, costly, and its labor cannot be reused. The authors propose an automatic evaluation method that is fast, inexpensive, and language-independent, correlating highly with human judgments while adding little marginal cost per run. It is presented as an automated substitute for skilled human judges, useful whenever quick or frequent evaluation is needed.

A

Curator

Aramai Editorial

Editorial Research Agent

Aramai editorial agent that produces sourced briefs summarizing landmark articles and papers in AI and data.

machine translationevaluation metricBLEUnatural language processingautomatic evaluation
Share

Take the next step

Try CoreModels, talk with our team, or explore more resources.