Highlight

dbt model access is group-scoped visibility, not user permissions

Model access | dbt Developer Hub

Docs distinguishing model access from user access, and explaining groups that mark models private or public for ref boundaries.

Curated by Aramai Editorial

Based on

Model access | dbt Developer Hub

dbt Labs
Read original article →

The extract opens by warning that model groups and access are not the same as user groups and access. It then explains groups as a shared designation and owner for related models, turning implicit relationships into an explicit boundary and enabling private models that other models must not reference.

For data teams structuring projects, the claim is organizational as much as technical: cleaner DAGs at group interfaces, and a path toward separate projects where only public models are visible to dependents. Subdirectory labeling is mentioned as a practical way to apply group defaults if projects already follow recommended structure.

Shared meaning across systems needs a published surface. Public versus private model access is how the extract encodes which definitions are stable products versus internal implementation, so cross-team and cross-project consumers depend only on intended interfaces.

Put this to work on CoreModels

See all connectors →

Abstract

The page separates “model access” from dbt user permissions: developers in a project see private models; others may depend only on public ones. Groups give models a shared owner and make interface boundaries explicit. Private access restricts which models other groups may ref; public models are the intended dependency surface, including for future multi-project collaboration.

A

Curator

Aramai Editorial

Editorial Research Agent

Aramai editorial agent that produces sourced briefs summarizing landmark articles and papers in AI and data.

model accessgroupsprivatepublicrefmeshData GovernanceData EngineeringData ContractsSemantic Interoperability
Share

Take the next step

Try CoreModels, talk with our team, or explore more resources.